• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Napier Baillie Wilson Bacon & Tallone, P.C.
  • Our Firm
  • Our People
  • Our Practice
    • Wrongful Death
    • Personal Injury
    • Public Sector Labor & Employment Law
    • Forms
  • Clients
  • Legal Trends
  • Successes
  • Community
    • Events
  • Contact
Legal Trends

Legal Trends

State v. Serna – Arizona Supreme Court Limits Officers’ Ability to Stop and Frisk

September 29, 2014 by Cassidy Bacon

In August, the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously held that in order to frisk an individual, “officers must reasonably suspect both that criminal activity is afoot and that the suspect is armed and dangerous.”

In 2010, while patrolling a neighborhood known for gang activity, two officers observed Serna and a woman standing in the street talking. When the pair separated and began walking in opposite directions, one of the officers called out to Serna who returned. The officers noticed a bulge in Serna’s waistband and asked him if he had any weapons. Serna admitted to having a gun. The officers then ordered Serna to put his hands on his head, frisked him, and removed the gun from his waistband. In response to some additional questions, Serna admitted to having a prior felony conviction and being a prohibited possessor. He was then arrested.

At trial, Serna’s attorneys argued the gun should be suppressed because the officers had violated Serna’s Fourth Amendment rights. The trial court rejected that argument, finding that the stop was consensual and that the frisk was justified for officer safety reasons. Serna was ultimately convicted and sentenced to two and a half years in prison.

The Arizona Supreme Court reversed Serna’s conviction and sentence. Although Ninth Circuit precedent allows an officer to frisk an individual if there is reasonable suspicion the individual is armed, the court concluded that in Arizona, where citizens are legally permitted to carry both visible and concealed weapons, the mere presence of a gun is insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion that the individual is presently dangerous. Accordingly, to frisk an armed individual, an officer must also have a reasonable suspicion that the individual was engaged or about to engage in criminal activity.

Home / Legal Trends / State v. Serna – Arizona Supreme Court Limits Officers’ Ability to Stop and Frisk

About Cassidy Bacon

Cassidy was born and raised in Ashland, Ohio. She received a B.S. summa cum laude in 2009 and a J.D. cum laude in 2013 from Arizona State University, where she was a Willard H. Pedrick Scholar and an associate editor of the Arizona State Law Journal.

Primary Sidebar

Articles by Year

  • 2020
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2015
  • 2014

Footer

Locations

Napier Baillie Wilson Bacon & Tallone, P.C.

2525 E Arizona Biltmore Circle
Suite 135
Phoenix, AZ 85016
office (602) 248-9107
fax (602) 248-0971
email mnapierpc@aol.com

MPA Office

456 N Vineyard
Mesa, AZ 85201

PLEA Office

1102 W Adams St.
Phoenix, AZ 85007

PPOA Office

9720 West Peoria Ave.
Suite 118-B
Peoria, Arizona 85345
  • Facebook

Footer Links

  • Arizona's Finest Lawyers Foundation
  • America's Top 100 Attorneys
  • The National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • 7 Figure Litigators

Disclaimer | Client's Rights and Responsibilities
Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases.

Copyright © 2023 Napier Baillie Wilson Bacon & Tallone, P.C.. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Website designed and developed by 911MEDIA.